↓ Expand ↓

Archive → Author

“Top Chemistry Moments of 2013″ Google Hangout #topchem 1/9 3PM Eastern

Everyone loves a good year-end roundup. Chemists are no exception.

But condensing a year’s worth of discoveries into a neat little “top 10″ package is bound to stir up some discussion. What goes on the list? Who got left out?

We hope you readers will help hash out these questions at C&EN’s second Google Hangout, “Top Chemistry Moments of 2013“. It’s on Thursday, January 9, at 3PM Eastern US time. For those new to Google Hangouts, they are video chats broadcast live on the web. You can watch from Google Plus or YouTube. After the chat is finished it is archived on YouTube for anyone to view.

Join the Hangout here.

Carmen Drahl and Lauren Wolf will speak with Laura Howes and Ashutosh Jogalekar about the people and the research that made chemistry news in 2013, and talk about what to watch in 2014.

Follow the conversation, and ask questions to the speakers on Twitter using the hashtag #topchem.

Laura HowesLaura Howes is Editor of Science in School , the European journal for science teachers that highlights cutting-edge research and teaching. She is a former science correspondent for Chemistry World magazine. Follow her on Twitter at @L_Howes.
Ashutosh JogalekarAsh Jogalekar does molecular modeling at Ensemble Therapeutics, a biotech startup in Cambridge, MA focused on using the specific base-pairing properties of DNA to synthesize novel macrocycle drugs. Ash has been blogging at “The Curious Wavefunction” for about eight years and at Scientific American Blogs since 2012. His main interests are in the history of chemistry, in understanding the relationship between chemical models and reality, and in studying chemistry as a tool-driven rather than an idea-driven revolution. Follow him on Twitter @curiouswavefn.
Lauren K. WolfLauren Wolf is an associate editor at Chemical & Engineering News. Follow her on Twitter @laurenkwolf.
Carmen DrahlCarmen Drahl is a senior editor at Chemical & Engineering News. Follow her on Twitter @carmendrahl.

This Week on GlobCasino: Smaug, Top Videos, and More

Tweet of the Week:
I sure hope that ticket to the AAAS Meeting is refundable…

To the Network:
Cleantech Chemistry: Taking out the Trash

Newscripts: Vitamin D, Divider Of Good And Evil? We Don’t Think So and Amusing News Aliquots and Top 10 Chemistry Videos Of 2013 and Merry Christmas From Newscripts! and Virtual Science-y Fireplaces

The Safety Zone: Friday chemical safety round up

The Watch Glass: Why I Became a Chemist and Giant Ice Caves a Proxy for Martian Caves That Could Hold Life and Chemistry Christmas Cards and The Chemistry of Christmas and Nano-snowman and Toys-Growing Outlet for Plastics

This Week on GlobCasino: Holiday Gift Guide, Crystal Plant Accident, and More

Tweet of the Week:

Chemjobber tweeted this, but credit has to go to Derek Lowe for writing it. I bow down before his superior writing skills. Who else could pull off a reference to camp horror movies in a post about 23AndMe and FDA?

Happy Turkey Day, chem-keteers. And remember, tryptophan doesn’t make you sleepy on Thanksgiving. Overeating does.

To the Network:

Cleantech Chemistry: M&G Paves the Way for Coke’s PlantBottle in China

Newscripts: 2013 Holiday Gift Guide and Amusing News Aliquots and In Print: Sriracha Sensation, Deceptive Dishware

The Safety Zone: Friday chemical safety round up and Crystal plant accident caused by stress corrosion cracking

The Watch Glass: The Cranberry Sensation and A tiny atomic generator and Remembering JFK and JFK, a death in the family and Science in the Romantic Age and RIP, Frederick Sanger and Goodyear Spectrometer and It’s elemental: Chlorine and Antenna and Protection for police officers

This Week on GlobCasino: “Bright Orange” Chemical, Pyrolysis for Biofuels, and More

Tweet of the Week:

It’s a two-week post this time around. Thanks for bearing with me while I was away!

To the Network:

Cleantech Chemistry: Little Green Feedstocks and New Probe Aids Enzyme Mixology for Biofuels and Pyrolysis: the third way to biofuels

Newscripts: Amusing News Aliquots and In Print: Racing Cells, Baby Dinos and Amusing News Aliquots

The Safety Zone: Friday chemical safety round up and What’s that ‘bright orange’ chemical?

The Watch Glass: Gilbert N. Lewis and Global Warming 1995 and Psychoactive Drugs and Plastics Recycling and Helping the Returning Veteran and Happy Birthday, Marie Curie! and The Plastic Car and Radioactive Waste Disposal Methods Under Study and Japanese Nuclear Power and The Phantom Patient and Cobalt: It’s Elemental

This Week on GlobCasino: The Big Bang Theory, Free #chemsafety journals, and more

Tweet of the Week:

This week’s roundup was written on Oct. 31, hence the Halloween mood. I’m away today and all of next week, back in the saddle on Nov. 11th. Overlord out.

To the network:
Newscripts: Turning A Hollywood Set Into A Laboratory and Amusing News Aliquots

The Safety Zone: Free chemical health and safety journal articles

The Watch Glass: Nanopumpkins and Silly String and Pumpkins removing PCB’s and Cell Skeleton Mimics

Guest Post: “Perception is Power: How the Supplement Industry Bought Deregulation” by Tien Nguyen

Today’s guest post is from Tien Nguyen, an organic chemistry grad student at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Tien is passionate about science outreach through the printed word, social media, and multimedia. On Twitter @mustlovescience and at her blog Must Love Science, she posts about timely chemistry topics and showcases the educational videos about chemistry that she helps create, including “The Fresh Bread of Bel-Air”. She is also a regular contributor to the RSC Catalysis Science & Technology Blog. Here she discusses a chapter of a new book that’s galvanized her views on science communication. Take it away, Tien!

In 2008, more than 200 people were poisoned by massive doses of selenium in liquid multivitamin supplements, Total Body Formula and Total Body Mega Formula. One of the victims was a telephone repairman named John Adams. As reported by the Chicago Tribune, Adams experienced severe loss of hair, fingernails and toenails and fatigue. He eventually became too exhausted to work and was forced to retire.

Other symptoms of selenium poisoning include diarrhea, joint pain, cramps and blistering skin. The FDA found that on average each Total Body serving contained 40,800 micrograms instead of 200 micrograms as planned. Nearly 50,000 supplement related adverse health effects are reported each year. Most supplements, like the Total Body Formula multivitamins, have not undergone any safety testing nor were they required to by law.

That’s because almost 20 years ago, Congress passed the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) of 1994, establishing that dietary supplements—vitamins, minerals, herbs, amino acids, enzymes, organ tissues, glandulars (materials from animal organs, glands or tissues) and metabolites—do not have to submit to FDA safety testing before being available to the public.

Referring to the Act’s passage, author Dan Hurley wrote, “So began an unprecedented experiment to test whether the unbridled use of vitamins and other supplements would help or hinder health, with the American public as the guinea pig.”

As long as a supplement is labelled as such and includes a disclaimer stating the lack of approval from the FDA, the bottle is cleared for supermarket shelves. If, after wide circulation, the supplement causes adverse health effects, like organ failure or death, the FDA can step in and pull it off the market.

Say what? Oh, you didn’t know supplements were totally exempt from pre-market safety regulations? Neither did 68 percent of Americans, according to a 2002 Harris poll.

Nor did I, until earlier this year when I reviewed Paul Offit’s new book, “Do you Believe in Magic: The Sense and Nonsense of Alternative Medicine.” He dedicates a chapter to the DSHEA, setting the stage with a quote from prominent philosopher Isaiah Berlin: “Liberty for the wolves is death for the lambs.” He illustrates how a carefully crafted marketing scheme, rooted in manipulation and backed by millions of dollars, could effectively harness public opinion. This kind of branding would make even Mad Men’s advertising king Don Draper wish he had thought of it.

Launched by vitamin industry executives, Offit explains how the campaign took a multi-pronged approach. First, Congress was inundated with letters. Vitamin industry interests sent in pre-printed letters and offered consumers discounts at thousands of health food stores in exchange for writing letters backing the Act. The letters had a unifying message, which was people wanted freedom to choose when it came to their supplements.  The messaging was designed to stoke individualistic pride and incite distrust of government regulation.

The book recounts how supplement makers argued that deregulation would give the public access to the widest range of supplements, allowing the American people to decide for ourselves and our families if a supplement was worthy. But, as Offit points out, the Act ensures that supplement makers would not have to provide any safety or efficacy data for us to base that decision on.

According to Offit’s book, the vitamin industry also perpetuated the false dogma that their products are natural, and by default safe, while drugs are man-made and unsafe. This is a fallacy because many drugs are derived from natural sources and either way, any product’s safety can only be determined through testing.

The campaign’s most powerful line, “you have a right to your supplements and the FDA is trying to take one of your basic rights away,” was parroted by highly recognizable celebrities like Mel Gibson and Sissy Spacek in television commercials, gaining widespread traction with the public. Offit describes how opponents of the Act, like Congressman Henry Waxman of California, were dealt with head-on, with hecklers paid to shout over him at public speaking events.

Supporters of the Act believed the FDA was uninterested in safety and just wanted to clear a path for the pharmaceutical industry to profit. Offit suggests that it was actually the vitamin industry that put aside public safety and had the most to gain financially from the legislation. Having successfully rebuffed regulation, the supplement industry pulled in $28 billion in 2007, up from $4 billion in 1994, a tidy return on investment. Since then, about 51,000 new supplements have flooded the market. Only about 170 of those have any documented safety tests.

After reading Offit’s book and many articles supporting his points, I believe the campaign to enact the DSHEA is a stark example of using misinformation to mold public opinion and ultimately influence legislation. Supplement makers realized this goal by investing serious amounts time, money and effort. The scientific community needs to counter these movements with investments of our own.

From translating studies that evaluate the safety and efficacy of certain supplements to clarifying legislative acts like this one, we have to make this information accessible to as many people as possible. Improving science literacy and public opinions of science can feel like an uphill battle, but with human lives at stake, it is one worth fighting.

Editor’s Note: If you’d like to read a full review of “Do You Believe in Magic? The Sense and Nonsense of Alternative Medicine”, please see the review from C&EN’s Nader Heidari in our Sept. 2 issue.

Join “Countdown to the Chemistry Nobel!” Google Hangout #chemnobel – UPDATED

Who’s going to take home the 2013 Nobel Prize in Chemistry? Will chemistry’s most coveted honor go to (GASP!) a biologist?

Is there any point to all this pre-Nobel speculation? Maybe not, but there’s no denying chemists enjoy taking part in the conversation.

That’s why we hope readers will tune in to C&EN’s first Google Hangout, “Countdown to the Chemistry Nobel!” this Thursday, October 3, at 3PM Eastern US time. For those new to Google Hangouts, they are video chats broadcast live on the web. You can watch from Google Plus or YouTube. After the chat is finished it is archived on YouTube for anyone to view.

Join the Hangout here.

Carmen Drahl and Lauren Wolf will speak with Neil Withers and Paul Bracher about the runup to this year’s prize, which will be announced Wednesday, October 9. What predictions are out there already and how reliable are they? Why did so few people predict that Dan Shechtman would win the Nobel Prize for quasicrystals? Watch for a discussion about these and other questions.

Follow the conversation, and ask questions to the speakers on Twitter using the hashtag #chemnobel.

UPDATE 10/2: I’m excited to announce another guest has joined the hangout: Simon Frantz.

Simonfrantz11Simon Frantz is Editor of BBC Future, and a former senior editor of Nobelprize.org. Follow him on Twitter @simon_frantz
NeilWithersNeil Withers is Features Editor for Chemistry World magazine. Follow him on Twitter @neilwithers
pjb_defense_200Paul Bracher blogs at Chembark, and is Assistant Professor of Chemistry at St. Louis University. Follow him on Twitter @Chembark
Carmen DrahlCarmen Drahl is a senior editor at Chemical & Engineering News. Follow her on Twitter @carmendrahl
Lauren Wolf is an associate editor at Chemical & Engineering News. Follow her on Twitter @laurenkwolf

This Week on GlobCasino: Breaking Bad, Addiction Chemistry, and More

Tweet of the Week:

To the Network:

Newscripts: Amusing News Aliquots and ‘Breaking Bad’ Aliquots

Terra Sigillata: Bayer CropScience Hiring Ph.D. Analytical Chemist in RTP

The Watch Glass: Nanotubes from inorganic materials and Nicotine: Chemistry of Addiction and Chemistry of Cancer Metastasis and Synthetic Leaf, pre-Nocera and The Chemistry of Flavor